I envision fans of the television reboot of Scream (which is an atrocity) loving the latter version of Cabin Fever-but that doesn’t necessarily mean the Travis Z-directed remake is all dreadful. Cabin Fever (2016), on the other hand, is a hyper-driven, high-definition, MTV video-less downgrade.
Cabin Fever (2002) holds its place as an interestingly millennial satire and entertaining gorefest, fresh with flat characters incapable of change being killed off one by one to conjure a paradigm about life and humanity. From there, chaos ensues and infection spreads like wildfire.Īt the tender age of fourteen years old, the original 2002 film is not ground-shattering horror cinema. After settling in and getting into some good ol’ adolescently adult-bound mischief, the quintet has a late night visit from someone bloody and boiled. Five college kids embark on a weeklong vacation to a cabin in the forest of a small, quaint town, quipped with cliché redneck locals warning the group to stay out of the woods.
Although there are some small shifts in plot, comparing to 2002’s version, the concept is precisely integral.
#WILL THERE EVER BE ANOTHER CABIN FEVER MOVIE MOVIE#
The story in this Cabin Fever remake exactly matches the original, as the movie was made using the same script, for the most part. Why was this movie being redone? Fun? Art? Money? Nostalgia? Will there be any interviews revealing why? I’ve yet to read any after the release, more information should come of light. When I heard Eli Roth’s Cabin Fever was being remade, and it was not a follow-up to the recent Cabin Fever: Patient Zero, I was befuddled.
0 kommentar(er)
